The Differences Between HGH Injections and HGH Transdermal GEL| Georgia Balsley| Jump On The Gel Today

The Differences Between HGH Injections and HGH Transdermal GEL| Georgia Balsley| Jump On The Gel Today


Dr. Georgia Balsley
Call Notes

Naturopathic Doctor for 32 years, Esthetician, Master Herbalist, from Redding, Michigan



~Injection being used as straight Somatropin (the straight hormone) and body uses what it can, but there is extra Somatropin hormone left in the system and this is what can cause side effects.



~In homeopathy, the more diluted a substance is, the stronger the solution is.

~Somaderm targets the HPA (hypothalamus, pituitary, adrenal) axis to help in healing. Helps Balance this axis.

~No known drug interactions.

~zero side effects reported to the FDA during the registration process.

~In homeopathy or the herbal world, you will rarely ever have a product FDA registered-this means that there was tons of clinical data presented to the FDA in order to get it registered and the NDC number.

~30X means this formula is very targeted, deeper impact.

~Vitamin E source extracted from soy, but there is ZERO soy in this product.

~Because of the microdosing, this product actually stimulates your body to produce its own HGH.

~This product does not over stimulate the body as the injections can do.

~Extremely targeted formulation.

~NDC # is another form of checks and balances.

~First must meet the HPUS requirements (Homeopathic Pharmacopeia United States) in order to be registered.

  1. Must be deemed Safe & Effective, according to specific and general pharmacy and relevant sections of the HPUS.
  2. Must be approved by the HPUS.
  3. Must have submitted documentation in the format set forth by the HPUS.
  4. Anything put forward is considered a new drug and the therapeutic use of a non-official, homeopathic drug must have proven & clinical verification acceptable to HPUS.
  5. Must have a therapeutic use established through published documentation.

~Therapeutic use is established through NO LESS than two double blind clinical trials, and data gathered from clinical experience encompassing the symptom picture of pre and post use.

~Alex Goldstein didn’t just slap a label on this bottle and stick on a shelf, he had to go through specific requirements to get the FDA registration.

~We can feel confident that there was a lot of research data put forth into getting this product registered.

~The longer we sleep the more our bodies recuperate.

~REM sleep = body repairs

~Melatonin is a hormone; our body’s own melatonin is being enhanced when your body is in REM sleep.

~A placebo effect would NEVER cause the brain to have a vivid dream.


For more information, go to




Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner, Takes Homeopathy Seriously | HuffPost

Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner, Takes Homeopathy Seriously | HuffPost

01/30/2011 11:50 am ET Updated Dec 06, 2017

Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner, Takes Homeopathy Seriously

In a remarkable interview published in Science magazine of December 24, 2010, (1) Professor Luc Montagnier, has expressed support for the often maligned and misunderstood medical specialty of homeopathic medicine. Although homeopathy has persisted for 200+ years throughout the world and has been the leading alternative treatment method used by physicians in Europe, (2) most conventional physicians and scientists have expressed skepticism about its efficacy due to the extremely small doses of medicines used.

Most clinical research conducted on homeopathic medicines that has been published in peer-review journals have shown positive clinical results,(3, 4) especially in the treatment of respiratory allergies (5, 6), influenza, (7) fibromyalgia, (8, 9) rheumatoid arthritis, (10) childhood diarrhea, (11) post-surgical abdominal surgery recovery, (12) attention deficit disorder, (13) and reduction in the side effects of conventional cancer treatments. (14) In addition to clinical trials, several hundred basic science studies have confirmed the biological activity of homeopathic medicines. One type of basic science trials, called in vitro studies, found 67 experiments (1/3 of them replications) and nearly 3/4 of all replications were positive. (15, 16)

In addition to the wide variety of basic science evidence and clinical research, further evidence for homeopathy resides in the fact that they gained widespread popularity in the U.S. and Europe during the 19th century due to the impressive results people experienced in the treatment of epidemics that raged during that time, including cholera, typhoid, yellow fever, scarlet fever, and influenza.

Montagnier, who is also founder and president of the World Foundation for AIDS Research and Prevention, asserted, “I can’t say that homeopathy is right in everything. What I can say now is that the high dilutions (used in homeopathy) are right. High dilutions of something are not nothing. They are water structures which mimic the original molecules.”

Here, Montagnier is making reference to his experimental research that confirms one of the controversial features of homeopathic medicine that uses doses of substances that undergo sequential dilution with vigorous shaking in-between each dilution. Although it is common for modern-day scientists to assume that none of the original molecules remain in solution, Montagnier’s research (and other of many of his colleagues) has verified that electromagnetic signals of the original medicine remains in the water and has dramatic biological effects.

Montagnier has just taken a new position at Jiaotong University in Shanghai, China (this university is often referred to as “China’s MIT”), where he will work in a new institute bearing his name. This work focuses on a new scientific movement at the crossroads of physics, biology, and medicine: the phenomenon of electromagnetic waves produced by DNA in water. He and his team will study both the theoretical basis and the possible applications in medicine.

Montagnier’s new research is investigating the electromagnetic waves that he says emanate from the highly diluted DNA of various pathogens. Montagnier asserts, “What we have found is that DNA produces structural changes in water, which persist at very high dilutions, and which lead to resonant electromagnetic signals that we can measure. Not all DNA produces signals that we can detect with our device. The high-intensity signals come from bacterial and viral DNA.”

Montagnier affirms that these new observations will lead to novel treatments for many common chronic diseases, including but not limited to autism, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis.

Montagnier first wrote about his findings in 2009, (17) and then, in mid-2010, he spoke at a prestigious meeting of fellow Nobelists where he expressed interest in homeopathy and the implications of this system of medicine. (18)

French retirement laws do not allow Montagnier, who is 78 years of age, to work at a public institute, thereby limiting access to research funding. Montagnier acknowledges that getting research funds from Big Pharma and certain other conventional research funding agencies is unlikely due to the atmosphere of antagonism to homeopathy and natural treatment options.

Support from Another Nobel Prize winner

Montagnier’s new research evokes memories one of the most sensational stories in French science, often referred to as the ‘Benveniste affair.’ A highly respected immunologist Dr. Jacques Benveniste., who died in 2004, conducted a study which was replicated in three other university laboratories and that was published in Nature (19). Benveniste and other researchers used extremely diluted doses of substances that created an effect on a type of white blood cell called basophils.

Although Benveniste’s work was supposedly debunked, (20) Montagnier considers Benveniste a “modern Galileo” who was far ahead of his day and time and who was attacked for investigating a medical and scientific subject that orthodoxy had mistakenly overlooked and even demonized.

In addition to Benveniste and Montagnier is the weighty opinion of Brian Josephson, Ph.D., who, like Montagnier, is a Nobel Prize-winning scientist.

Responding to an article on homeopathy in New Scientist, Josephson wrote:

Regarding your comments on claims made for homeopathy: criticisms centered around the vanishingly small number of solute molecules present in a solution after it has been repeatedly diluted are beside the point, since advocates of homeopathic remedies attribute their effects not to molecules present in the water, but to modifications of the water’s structure.

Simple-minded analysis may suggest that water, being a fluid, cannot have a structure of the kind that such a picture would demand. But cases such as that of liquid crystals, which while flowing like an ordinary fluid can maintain an ordered structure over macroscopic distances, show the limitations of such ways of thinking. There have not, to the best of my knowledge, been any refutations of homeopathy that remain valid after this particular point is taken into account.

A related topic is the phenomenon, claimed by Jacques Benveniste’s colleague Yolène Thomas and by others to be well established experimentally, known as “memory of water.” If valid, this would be of greater significance than homeopathy itself, and it attests to the limited vision of the modern scientific community that, far from hastening to test such claims, the only response has been to dismiss them out of hand. (21)

Following his comments Josephson, who is an emeritus professor of Cambridge University in England, was asked by New Scientist editors how he became an advocate of unconventional ideas. He responded:

I went to a conference where the French immunologist Jacques Benveniste was talking for the first time about his discovery that water has a ‘memory’ of compounds that were once dissolved in it — which might explain how homeopathy works. His findings provoked irrationally strong reactions from scientists, and I was struck by how badly he was treated. (22)

Josephson went on to describe how many scientists today suffer from “pathological disbelief;” that is, they maintain an unscientific attitude that is embodied by the statement “even if it were true I wouldn’t believe it.”

Even more recently, Josephson wryly responded to the chronic ignorance of homeopathy by its skeptics saying, “The idea that water can have a memory can be readily refuted by any one of a number of easily understood, invalid arguments.”

In the new interview in Science, Montagnier also expressed real concern about the unscientific atmosphere that presently exists on certain unconventional subjects such as homeopathy, “I am told that some people have reproduced Benveniste’s results, but they are afraid to publish it because of the intellectual terror from people who don’t understand it.”

Montagnier concluded the interview when asked if he is concerned that he is drifting into pseudoscience, he replied adamantly: “No, because it’s not pseudoscience. It’s not quackery. These are real phenomena which deserve further study.”

The Misinformation That Skeptics Spread

It is remarkable enough that many skeptics of homeopathy actually say that there is “no research” that has shows that homeopathic medicines work. Such statements are clearly false, and yet, such assertions are common on the Internet and even in some peer-review articles. Just a little bit of searching can uncover many high quality studies that have been published in highly respected medical and scientific journals, including the LancetBMJPediatricsPediatric Infectious Disease JournalChest and many others. Although some of these same journals have also published research with negative results to homeopathy, there is simply much more research that shows a positive rather than negative effect.

Misstatements and misinformation on homeopathy are predictable because this system of medicine provides a viable and significant threat to economic interests in medicine, let alone to the very philosophy and worldview of biomedicine. It is therefore not surprising that the British Medical Association had the sheer audacity to refer to homeopathy as “witchcraft.” It is quite predictable that when one goes on a witch hunt, one inevitable finds “witches,” especially when there are certain benefits to demonizing a potential competitor (homeopathy plays a much larger and more competitive role in Europe than it does in the USA).

Skeptics of homeopathy also have long asserted that homeopathic medicines have “nothing” in them because they are diluted too much. However, new research conducted at the respected Indian Institutes of Technology has confirmed the presence of “nanoparticles” of the starting materials even at extremely high dilutions. Researchers have demonstrated by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), electron diffraction and chemical analysis by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES), the presence of physical entities in these extreme dilutions. (24) In the light of this research, it can now be asserted that anyone who says or suggests that there is “nothing” in homeopathic medicines is either simply uninformed or is not being honest.

Because the researchers received confirmation of the existence of nanoparticles at two different homeopathic high potencies (30C and 200C) and because they tested four different medicines (Zincum met./zinc; Aurum met. /gold; Stannum met./tin; and Cuprum met./copper), the researchers concluded that this study provides “concrete evidence.”

Although skeptics of homeopathy may assume that homeopathic doses are still too small to have any biological action, such assumptions have also been proven wrong. The multi-disciplinary field of small dose effects is called “hormesis,” and approximately 1,000 studies from a wide variety of scientific specialties have confirmed significant and sometimes substantial biological effects from extremely small doses of certain substances on certain biological systems.

A special issue of the peer-review journal, Human and Experimental Toxicology (July 2010), devoted itself to the interface between hormesis and homeopathy. (25) The articles in this issue verify the power of homeopathic doses of various substances.

In closing, it should be noted that skepticism of any subject is important to the evolution of science and medicine. However, as noted above by Nobelist Brian Josephson, many scientists have a “pathological disbelief” in certain subjects that ultimately create an unhealthy and unscientific attitude blocks real truth and real science. Skepticism is at its best when its advocates do not try to cut off research or close down conversation of a subject but instead explore possible new (or old) ways to understand and verify strange but compelling phenomena. We all have this challenge as we explore and evaluate the biological and clinical effects of homeopathic medicines.


(1) Enserink M, Newsmaker Interview: Luc Montagnier, French Nobelist Escapes “Intellectual Terror” to Pursue Radical Ideas in China. Science 24 December 2010: Vol. 330 no. 6012 p. 1732. DOI: 10.1126/science.330.6012.1732

(2) Ullman D. Homeopathic Medicine: Europe’s #1 Alternative for Doctors.

(3) Linde L, Clausius N, Ramirez G, et al., “Are the Clinical Effects of Homoeopathy Placebo Effects? A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials,” Lancet, September 20, 1997, 350:834-843.

(4) Lüdtke R, Rutten ALB. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. October 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06/015.

(5) Taylor, MA, Reilly, D, Llewellyn-Jones, RH, et al., Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial Series, BMJ, August 19, 2000, 321:471-476.

(6) Ullman, D, Frass, M. A Review of Homeopathic Research in the Treatment of Respiratory Allergies. Alternative Medicine Review. 2010:15,1:48-58.

(7) Vickers AJ. Homoeopathic Oscillococcinum for preventing and treating influenza and influenza-like syndromes. Cochrane Reviews. 2009.

(8) Bell IR, Lewis II DA, Brooks AJ, et al. Improved clinical status in fibromyalgia patients treated with individualized homeopathic remedies versus placebo, Rheumatology. 2004:1111-5.

(9) Fisher P, Greenwood A, Huskisson EC, et al., “Effect of Homoeopathic Treatment on Fibrositis (Primary Fibromyalgia),” BMJ, 299(August 5, 1989):365-6.

(10) Jonas, WB, Linde, Klaus, and Ramirez, Gilbert, “Homeopathy and Rheumatic Disease,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, February 2000,1:117-123.

(11) Jacobs J, Jonas WB, Jimenez-Perez M, Crothers D, Homeopathy for Childhood Diarrhea: Combined Results and Metaanalysis from Three Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2003;22:229-34.

(12) Barnes, J, Resch, KL, Ernst, E, “Homeopathy for Post-Operative Ileus: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1997, 25: 628-633.

(13) M, Thurneysen A. Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2005 Dec;164(12):758-67. Epub 2005 Jul 27.

(14) Kassab S, Cummings M, Berkovitz S, van Haselen R, Fisher P. Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2.

(15) Witt CM, Bluth M, Albrecht H, Weisshuhn TE, Baumgartner S, Willich SN. The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies—a systematic review of the literature. Complement Ther Med. 2007 Jun;15(2):128-38. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

(16) Endler PC, Thieves K, Reich C, Matthiessen P, Bonamin L, Scherr C, Baumgartner S. Repetitions of fundamental research models for homeopathically prepared dilutions beyond 10-23: a bibliometric study. Homeopathy, 2010; 99: 25-36.

(17) Luc Montagnier, Jamal Aissa, Stéphane Ferris, Jean-Luc Montagnier, Claude Lavallee, Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci (2009) 1: 81-90.

(18) Nobel laureate gives homeopathy a boost. The Australian. July 5, 2010.

(19) Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J, et al. (June 1988). “Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE”. Nature 333 (6176): 816-8.

(20) Maddox J (June 1988). “Can a Greek tragedy be avoided?”. Nature 333 (6176): 795-7.

(21) Josephson, B. D., Letter, New Scientist, November 1, 1997.

(22) George A. Lone Voices special: Take nobody’s word for it. New Scientist. December 9, 2006.

(23) Personal communication. Brian Josephson to Dana Ullman. January 5, 2011.

(24) Chikramane PS, Suresh AK, Bellare JR, and Govind S. Extreme homeopathic dilutions retain starting materials: A nanoparticulate perspective. Homeopathy. Volume 99, Issue 4, October 2010, 231-242.

(25) Human and Experimental Toxicology, July 2010:
To access free copies of these articles, see:


Dana Ullman, MPH, is America’s leading spokesperson for homeopathy and is the founder of He is the author of 10 books, including his bestseller, Everybody”s Guide to Homeopathic Medicines. His most recent book is, The Homeopathic Revolution: Why Famous People and Cultural Heroes Choose Homeopathy (the Foreword to this book was written by Dr. Peter Fisher, the Physician to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II). Dana lives, practices, and writes from Berkeley, California.

Source: Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner, Takes Homeopathy Seriously | HuffPost

Promoting Health & Wealth entrepreneurs needed to help us spread the great news!

Promoting Health & Wealth entrepreneurs needed to help us spread the great news!

We are lifting people up by promoting Health & Wealth worldwide. We are looking for entrepreneurs to help us spread the great news about the only Transdermal non-perscription HGH Gel sold.


What is in The Amazing Gel





Don’t You want to be one of the first in your network to get in on this Awesome Opportunity
Fine Your Champions and Join us with the Only Non Prescription Transdermal HGH Gel.



Get on board, join my team! With it you will get support like you have never had from any other Network Marketing Group.

Low startup cost of under $200.00 and no minimum purchases to keep you in the mix. If you are looking for that one product that could make a difference in anyone over 27? We have it here and you can have it as well. If this sounds good to you, lets talk.

My First 22 Days on HGH Gel| Why I joined NewUlife MLM| Join My HGH Middle TN Team

My First 22 Days on HGH Gel| Why I joined NewUlife MLM| Join My HGH Middle TN Team

My First 22 days on HGH Gel
Other than the normal daily very minor pains, I really didn’t have anything major, I needed or thought I would see improvement on other than maybe some extra Energy.
Well let me tell you, sometimes you don’t know you have pains when you have had them for a long period of time and it is really just everyday life with a hurt here or hurt there.
From about day 2 I have felt way more energy, it took me a week to realize that I didn’t want to crash or feel the urge to take a nap around 3:00 or 3:30 each day.
If you are a busy person like I am, things like getting tired will slip your mind and you just push on. Now that I look back I can see a huge difference with the Energy.


Next I don’t and haven’t hurt to a point where it affected me with any certain part of my body.
After saying that I can feel some difference in my knees and shoulders. One major thing I can tell you is, many times have pulled a muscle behind my left shoulder blade that hurts even to breath. I have had this for years and when it happens, I know like clockwork it will take me three days of doing nothing for the pain to stop. I have tried several times to push through it to only find it takes longer for that muscle to heal. I pulled this muscle on Sunday night and then stated preparing myself to go ease for the next three days. When I woke up at 5am on Monday I had zero pain, same muscle same left side as I have pulled for 15 years and nothing, no pain or anything. I even found myself moving to try to see if I could find or make the pain start just as a test.

I have also had a minor problem with my right hand for a couple of years, It is pretty stiff when I wake up but better 10 to 15 minutes after I am up and moving. Since I have been taking the Gel, I have had zero issue with my right hand.
My conclusion of taking the gel is, This is a Miracle Gel that works and for the $149.99 member price you would be crazy if you can afford a bottle, and not on it.
The non benefit for me is my hair is staring to grow, change color from grey to dark brown and my finger nails are needing cut way more than before. I guess with the other pros I can deal with cutting my hair and nails more.

Thanks and if you haven’t done it yet Jump On The Gel.
David Gray

digestive Testimonials Heart

digestive Testimonials Heart

Very Good Info on this: Paul B. states his testimony

Ok so about 3 weeks ago I was introduced to something called THE GEL,I was speaking with someone who I have respect for as a human and a business person.They spoke about the many benefits of this gel and what it has done for them and everyone else who has tried it ,I was naturally skeptical of course because lets face it about 90% of what you come across nowadays is a scam of some sort ! But as a die hard opportunity is knocking kind of guy I listened and boy am I glad I did ! In 3 weeks of applying this gel as directed I am now sleeping like a baby and actually waking up ready to go , I am getting better workouts in because my stamina has improved and maybe TMI but my digestive system is doing great lets just say ,Oh and I am down 5lbs and my energy levels are amazing ! No side effects and the shit does what it says its going to do.. WHAT…. Anyway there are many more benifits to come over next 5 months , Needless to say I am all in !!! If you are male or female over age 30 do yourself a favor and shut down your skeptisism just for a little bit .


Contact us